Comments on: September!? How did that happen? http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/ A work in progress Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:42:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Loki http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/comment-page-1/#comment-217 Loki Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:12:17 +0000 http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/#comment-217 Hm, okay, I forgive you then. But don't do it again! Hm, okay, I forgive you then. But don’t do it again!

]]> By: Obdormio http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/comment-page-1/#comment-216 Obdormio Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:21:59 +0000 http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/#comment-216 You are right, of course. I am sorry for upsetting you so, and for being so slow to respond. You are right, of course. I am sorry for upsetting you so, and for being so slow to respond.

]]> By: Loki http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/comment-page-1/#comment-215 Loki Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:03:45 +0000 http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/#comment-215 And now you don't even have the backbone to reply on your own weblog. Sigh. How do the testy fall. And now you don’t even have the backbone to reply on your own weblog.

Sigh. How do the testy fall.

]]> By: Loki http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/comment-page-1/#comment-214 Loki Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:22:41 +0000 http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/#comment-214 Oh, and "situations" seems to have lost an "u". Wow, you really had me irritated at your incompetence, didn't you? Oh, and “situations” seems to have lost an “u”. Wow, you really had me irritated at your incompetence, didn’t you?

]]> By: Loki http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/comment-page-1/#comment-213 Loki Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:22:08 +0000 http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/#comment-213 There's a "to" too few in the latter paragraph there, sorry about that, in my righteous wrath I got a little hasty. There’s a “to” too few in the latter paragraph there, sorry about that, in my righteous wrath I got a little hasty.

]]> By: Loki http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/comment-page-1/#comment-212 Loki Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:20:44 +0000 http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/#comment-212 My reply was directed at the latter sentence in the paragraph, where the "did" pointed back at TWO possibilities. I don't quite see how you can automatically assume that I indicated one of those two possibilities was more right than the other by my reply. (And just for your information, it was directed at the second alternative, that is "a similarly narrow definition") In the future, be kind as _not_ to think I'm stupid enough to oversee such handy exclusions to your logic, and you'll run into less of these awkward sitiations. My reply was directed at the latter sentence in the paragraph, where the “did” pointed back at TWO possibilities.

I don’t quite see how you can automatically assume that I indicated one of those two possibilities was more right than the other by my reply. (And just for your information, it was directed at the second alternative, that is “a similarly narrow definition”)

In the future, be kind as _not_ to think I’m stupid enough to oversee such handy exclusions to your logic, and you’ll run into less of these awkward sitiations.

]]> By: Obdormio http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/comment-page-1/#comment-211 Obdormio Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:52:54 +0000 http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/#comment-211 Well, in that case, your post was just wrong, as I was not watching Babylon 5 at 1:11 AM, September 16th. Well, in that case, your post was just wrong, as I was not watching Babylon 5 at 1:11 AM, September 16th.

]]> By: Loki http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/comment-page-1/#comment-210 Loki Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:41:19 +0000 http://obdormio.com/2006/09/16/september/#comment-210 "Loki’s timing is a bit off here, as I actually set aside time today to write here. Unless of course he used “currently” to mean “at this precise moment, 1:11 AM, September 16th” or a similarly narrow definition. Knowing him, he probably did." Damn straight. “Loki’s timing is a bit off here, as I actually set aside time today to write here. Unless of course he used “currently” to mean “at this precise moment, 1:11 AM, September 16th” or a similarly narrow definition. Knowing him, he probably did.”

Damn straight.

]]>