Sun 11 Jun 2006
I am sometimes accused of being overly critical. Some claim I am never satisfied, always finding errors. Honestly, just because they’re ten years old, doesn’t mean the play can’t be done well! I really think most of my criticism in situations like that is aimed at the adult instructors, not the children in it.
Anyway, I just thought I’d mention that before moving onto something completely unrelated. Having spent a good deal of time in the graveyards lately, I can’t help but noticing the graves. I thought I’d review one. Here it is:
At first viewing this 1939 grave is fairly impressive. The stone is much taller than the surrounding graves, it has a pane of glass containing a golden cross surrounded by what appears to be a wreath of laurel, a symbol of victory, also in gold. It has a pointed top, and the stone is of a sombre and dignified colour. There are some nice carvings in the top corners, and another cross in the top center. In addition to the name of the deceased and the dates of his birth and death, his job has also been carved in above the name. Looking at the other graves I see that this is fairly unusual, even for this period, so presumably he was very good at or very proud of the job. The job title and his name is repeated on the golden cross, which makes it look like a post-mortem award of some sort.
The inscription on the stone reads “We will meet again”, which manages to convey just about the right mix of sadness and optimism. However, all the writing is in a blocky and fairly unremarkable font, which fails to inspire awe. The stone itself is also showing signs of age, with some very worn patches, and discoloration.
This grave has an enclosed flower bed, which makes mowing around it easier, a big plus. The flowers are pretty, the mix of purple, green and red works well. It appears to be maintained, as it is not overgrown and messy. The ground around the grave is level and flat, very easy to mow.
Overall, the grave is impressiveand dignified, despite the worn stone and boring font. It is well maintained and easy on mowers. I give it four scythes.
Well, that’s it for now. Remember, maintain the graves of your ancestors the way you want your descendants to maintain yours!
June 12th, 2006 at 12:44
XDXDXDXDXD
You’re the Man, dude.
By the way:
“The inscription on the stone reads “We will meet againâ€, which manages to convey just about the right mix of sadness and optimism.”
:o
Are you trying to say that this is the tombstone of a dead nemesis?! Annoying how they didn’t add the comma and the name so we’d know which one. You could be standing on the grave of Dr. Moriarty! Dracula! The Count De La Fere! Edmond Dantes! The Pinguin! Lex Luthor! Dr. Evil! Dr. No! Saruman! Darth Vader! Mickey Mouse! Flintheart Glomgold! Gladstone Gander! Two-Face! Long John Silver! Sky’s the limit!
June 13th, 2006 at 22:22
…The Janitor?
June 13th, 2006 at 22:23
well, if any of these guys were very good at inspecting fishing…
June 14th, 2006 at 12:33
The nemesis would be all and every ship-captain. EVER. Damn those fucking nosey bureacrat-scumbags known as “fiskeinspektører”. There are more to life than the rule-book, you arrogant self-loving … I know no other expression that quite reflects my feeling for those half-humans, so I’m going to have to say hæstkuka. It’s a classic, after all.
June 14th, 2006 at 13:01
Bah. Jeg er elendig i engelsk. Hvordan staver man egentlig byråkrat på engelsk?