Top-image’s slightly less generic and slightly more “says really nothing about the person using it at all” than the one you had before, which is good, considering what the last one did say.
Design, well, to me, this is like the Smeg it!-thing without all the opera-stuff you got me used to. So it’s okay, I guess. Little white, maybe.
Yeah, the top image is inspired by the snow we’re currently drowning in. I got it from a free source. I’d take one myself if I had a camera.
And it is a bit white. If I did the design myself it would be greener. Unfortunately, this isn’t the simple html I know how to do, it’s all pieces and code to put it together. i understand the theory, I just haven’t been very successful with the practice yet. Sooner or later I’ll get it, and make my own theme, since I’m really unhappy with using something premade.
January 24th, 2006 at 21:25
Top-image’s slightly less generic and slightly more “says really nothing about the person using it at all” than the one you had before, which is good, considering what the last one did say.
Design, well, to me, this is like the Smeg it!-thing without all the opera-stuff you got me used to. So it’s okay, I guess. Little white, maybe.
January 24th, 2006 at 21:26
Unreasonably negative, you say? Why, Erlend, I honestly don’t know what you’re talking about…
January 24th, 2006 at 21:36
Yeah, the top image is inspired by the snow we’re currently drowning in. I got it from a free source. I’d take one myself if I had a camera.
And it is a bit white. If I did the design myself it would be greener. Unfortunately, this isn’t the simple html I know how to do, it’s all pieces and code to put it together. i understand the theory, I just haven’t been very successful with the practice yet. Sooner or later I’ll get it, and make my own theme, since I’m really unhappy with using something premade.
January 24th, 2006 at 21:41
Yeah, well, it’s nice enough. I’m just not liking change, ’s all. :\